Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:15:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Valentin Villenave <v.villen...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Neil Puttock <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This bug looks like #807, which has a patch pending. >> > >> > Indeed. But what about #882 then? >> >> Sounds like somebody should apply the patch and reevaluate all related >> bugs given their sample code. > > I think we could figure that out by ourselves. Unless you're > volunteering to do this testing, pointing this out only serves to > aggravate developers.
Well, the patch does fix the bug I reported (at the posting at the top of the thread). It has no effect on #882 or #732. Hardly surprising since the proposed patch for #807 touches _only_ the bracket code, and #882 and #732 don't involve brackets. Since _all_ of them involve centered columns and their dimensions, I can't rule out that the proposed patch has been made to work just by trial-and-error. BUT the braces before _and_ after patch _properly_ enclose the centered column. So my guess is that brace calculations are _impervious_ to the bug in #882/#732 (since the braces properly enclose their _contents_ in all the tested cases, either before or after the #807 patch), and the patch only affects the _outside_ of the braces, making them apparently occupy the right amount of space. So from my testing the patch is unrelated to #882/#732, and the bug in #882/#732 does not apparently affect the test case for #807 either which way. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
