On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and found > that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you actually > get 2. Trying 2 gives no clef at all. Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives > a clef but no transposition. > > I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8 actually > moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a > fiddle factor without checking the result. Not convinced anyone will use > these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug? > > \relative c' { > \clef treble > c c c c > \clef "treble^0" > c c c c > \clef "treble_2" > c c c c > \clef "treble_0" > c c c c > \clef "treble^2" > c c c c > }
This appears to be a bug. I'll look into it shortly, though I can't file a proper report at the moment. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
