Already reported and fixed, thanks.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1177
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick McCarty" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with transposing clefs
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and
found
that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you
actually
get 2. Trying 2 gives no clef at all. Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives
a clef but no transposition.
I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8
actually
moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a
fiddle factor without checking the result. Not convinced anyone will use
these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug?
\relative c' {
\clef treble
c c c c
\clef "treble^0"
c c c c
\clef "treble_2"
c c c c
\clef "treble_0"
c c c c
\clef "treble^2"
c c c c
}
This appears to be a bug. I'll look into it shortly, though I can't
file a proper report at the moment.
Thanks,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
