On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Patrick McCarty <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and found >> that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you actually >> get 2. Trying 2 gives no clef at all. Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives >> a clef but no transposition. >> >> I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8 actually >> moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a >> fiddle factor without checking the result. Not convinced anyone will use >> these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug? >> >> \relative c' { >> \clef treble >> c c c c >> \clef "treble^0" >> c c c c >> \clef "treble_2" >> c c c c >> \clef "treble_0" >> c c c c >> \clef "treble^2" >> c c c c >> } > > This appears to be a bug. I'll look into it shortly, though I can't > file a proper report at the moment.
Reported here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1177 I'll push a fix shortly. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
