% Hello, % % Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new % system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second % accidental in that measure. % % So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the following example:
\version "2.13.53"
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
\relative a' {
\key f \major
as2 as~ | as as~ | \break
as~ as~ | as as~ | \break
as as | b b~ | \break
b~ b~ | b b~ | \break
b b | cis cis~ | \break
cis~ cis~ | cis cis~ | \break
cis cis
}
%
%
% Zoltan<<attachment: acc-tie.png>>
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
