Neil Puttock <n.puttock <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem <sese <at> elte.hu> wrote: > > > > % Hello, > > % > > % Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new > > % system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second > > % accidental in that measure. > > I agree.[...] > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=649 > > Cheers, > Neil >
Stone, p55, agrees with Neil and Zoltan, in that Kurt Stone says the accidental "need not be repeated" if it follows the same repeated accidental due to a tie being broken across lines. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
