On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem <[email protected]> wrote: > > % Hello, > % > % Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new > % system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second > % accidental in that measure. > % > % So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the following example: > > \version "2.13.53" > \paper{ ragged-right = ##t } > \relative a' { > \key f \major > as2 as~ | as as~ | \break > as~ as~ | as as~ | \break > as as | b b~ | \break > b~ b~ | b b~ | \break > b b | cis cis~ | \break > cis~ cis~ | cis cis~ | \break > cis cis > }
I agree. I posted a tracker issue for this, but it was marked as invalid, despite my producing several examples from engraved scores: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=649 Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
