On Thu 22 Sep 2011, 09:40 David Kastrup wrote: > In my opinion, this report is invalid. Since Lilypond does optical > justification of noteheads (cf node "Optical Spacing" in the Lilypond > Essay), of _course_ its spacing depends on the stem direction. And of > _course_ this implies that there will be a small borderline where page > break decisions _also_ differ depending on the stem direction. > > A human engraver will make a random decision, and stick with this > decision even when one stem is flipped around for the next iteration, > changing the spacing slightly. > > Lilypond does not remember what it did last time around with that score, > and it does not throw dice. Please, I think it would be great it you added your opinion to tracker. I've marked this issue as "needs-evidence" -- but this "evidence" should not be lost.
Thank you! -- Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say. Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
