2011/9/22 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > "Dmytro O. Redchuk" <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Thu 22 Sep 2011, 09:40 David Kastrup wrote: >>> In my opinion, this report is invalid. Since Lilypond does optical >>> justification of noteheads (cf node "Optical Spacing" in the Lilypond >>> Essay), of _course_ its spacing depends on the stem direction. And of >>> _course_ this implies that there will be a small borderline where page >>> break decisions _also_ differ depending on the stem direction. >>> >>> A human engraver will make a random decision, and stick with this >>> decision even when one stem is flipped around for the next iteration, >>> changing the spacing slightly. >>> >>> Lilypond does not remember what it did last time around with that score, >>> and it does not throw dice. >> Please, I think it would be great it you added your opinion to tracker. I've >> marked this issue as "needs-evidence" -- but this "evidence" should not be >> lost. > > I see James already added the message. I don't always figure out what > kind of reply ends up in the tracker automatically (probably just those > sent directly by Rietveld's tracker) and what not.
I also have this problem. I can only say that nothing sent to Rietveld - eiter directly or indirectly - never goes to google tracker automatically. You can search for "some comments do not appear in the tracker page" on -devel or bug-, this problem was discussed a bitbut the solutions wasn't found. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
