On Oct 1, 2011, at 11:47 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Updates: > Status: Accepted > Labels: -fixed_2_15_13 > > Comment #4 on issue 1926 by [email protected]: 2.15.12 processing > speed problems > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1926 > > No. On my Windows Vista box, for a fairly complex piece of music (Finale Act > I of The Gondoliers - about 500 bars, 30-odd pages), I get: > > 2.12.3 - 545 seconds > 2.15.9 - 205 sec > 2.15.10 - 210 sec > 2.15.12 - 335 sec (+60%) > 2.15.13 - 341 sec > > So we see that for complex music, the problem remains. My experience of > running the regtests was that for simple music, 2.15.12 was OK to better; for > longer music much worse. I'd suggest using the Mozart Horn regtest as a test > case/comparator that somewhat fulfills this requirement.
Confirmed. I finally noticed the problem when I compiled a 30ish page new work on current master. Phil - could you send me the source files? I have a 2h train ride Monday evening that I can use to crunch Gilbert and Sullivan through various incarnations of 2.15 to find where the hike in compiling time crept in. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
