On 1 January 2012 14:47, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > If the headword explained this, it would be fine, but it doesn't and > therefore makes it look wrong. We don't use other archaic words unless > there's a clear reason?
It's a real music example (of a particularly famous piece), so should follow the practice of the majority of editions. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
