Neil Puttock <[email protected]> writes: > On 1 January 2012 14:47, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If the headword explained this, it would be fine, but it doesn't and >> therefore makes it look wrong. We don't use other archaic words unless >> there's a clear reason? > > It's a real music example (of a particularly famous piece), so should > follow the practice of the majority of editions.
It would still make sense to add a comment to that effect. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
