"David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Neil Puttock <[email protected]> writes:
On 1 January 2012 14:47, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
If the headword explained this, it would be fine, but it doesn't and
therefore makes it look wrong. We don't use other archaic words unless
there's a clear reason?
It's a real music example (of a particularly famous piece), so should
follow the practice of the majority of editions.
It would still make sense to add a comment to that effect.
--
David Kastrup
I'd agree, but it's a headword in the manual and I'm not sure it's possible.
As I'd said I was in the middle of LSR updates and so have changed this and
pushed to staging. If the consensus is that we should keep "ligato" I'll
change it back, with apologies.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
