On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: > Helge Kruse <[email protected]> writes: > >> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!> <f a d f> q >>> Well, just write the latter version. >> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord". > Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear. > >> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't >> have any q. >> >>> It appears I have >>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed, >>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get >>> dropped silently. >>> >> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be >> recorded as a new bug? > With q, it is more of an enhancement request. With > Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because > you cannot really work around it. > > Both are separate requests concerning separate code. > I am just not really understanding what technically these are as the thread talks about 'note splitting' and the like and this thread talks about repeated chords/notes using 'q'.
So if you could give me some appropriate tracker titles, I can hunt down the relevant threads and create the trackers more quickly. Thanks James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
