James <[email protected]> writes: > On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: >> Helge Kruse <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: >>> >>>> <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!> <f a d f> q >>>> Well, just write the latter version. >>> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord". >> Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear. >> >>> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't >>> have any q. >>> >>>> It appears I have >>>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed, >>>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get >>>> dropped silently. >>>> >>> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be >>> recorded as a new bug? >> With q, it is more of an enhancement request. With >> Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because >> you cannot really work around it. >> >> Both are separate requests concerning separate code. >> > I am just not really understanding what technically these are as the > thread talks about 'note splitting' and the like and this thread talks > about repeated chords/notes using 'q'. > > So if you could give me some appropriate tracker titles, I can hunt down > the relevant threads and create the trackers more quickly.
For q this thread is, as far as I remember, first mention. For Completion_heads_engraver, there was the thread explicitly mentioned in the issue description of issue 3593. With Completion_heads_engraver the issue might be called "Completion_heads_engraver should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals" I think the thread for that also mentioned articulations, but those are probably trickier: you'd likely want a tie/slur begin to move to the last generated note, but keep fingerings/text scripts on the first, and stuff like manual beams make my head hurt. The first approximation would likely just drop all articulations on repeated notes. For q (chord repeats), there is just one issue. "chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals". That's pretty straightforward. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
