Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> "chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals". That’s
>> pretty straightforward.
>
> Of course [because it’s 'common sense’], I agree this should be the default
> behaviour…
> But I think it would be nice if there were still a way to override
> that, e.g., q! and q? to repeat the accidentals.
I don't see that this makes sense.
<a! cis d?> q!
is going to be what?
<a cis d> q?
is going to be what?
At some point of time, one just has to accept that q is a shorthand.
Once it becomes hard figuring out the proper semantics, we are leaving
the shorthand realm.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
