Am 13.08.2017 um 09:53 schrieb Knut Petersen:
Am 12.08.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 12.08.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
Still, the output doesn’t match at least /my/ expectations:
notes should either not be merged at all, or there should be
stacked accidentals indicating which one applies to which Voice.

How should this be a default behaviour? IMO none of those two options looks good and unambiguous. But here are three possible solutions to your problem (I like the third most):

We might decide that it is ok to provide an ambiguous engraving, but the engraving lilypond provides is clearly broken and should be fixed.

I agree on that and on the comments to your examples
• Hauke A (current default is buggy)
• Knut C (why Malte B is no solution)
• Malte C (don’t add staves automagically)

Some comments of mine to the other examples:
• Knut A: I agree it looks a little bit ambiguous but in chords (not in polyphony though) it’s the best solution for a *default* behaviour. (btw it has to be sharp-natural like here, not natural-sharp) • Knut B: This works only unambiguously with much more horizontal space. So IMO not a good solution for default behaviour. • Malte A: Same problem as Knut B but Knut B is better (look at the g-sharp/a-sharp on beat 4) • Malte B: Not a thing for default because of cases like Knut C and the accidentals are too small to read.

So IMO the default should be changed from Hauke A to Knut A. This works only for chords but polyphony should use seperate staves here anyway.

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to