2017-08-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de>: > Hi Phil! >>> >>> regards, >>> Hauke Rehr (from Germany) >> >> >> Looks the same as https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1134/ ? >> > Yes, it is the same old bug/defect/limitation. Although the problem is > documented in the notation manual I think it actually is a serious defect. > > The code that automatically adds accidentals does not support different > accidentals for the same pitch at the same time. "Merged" notes are not the > cause of the problem (btw: lilypond never merges noteheads, it prints > multiple noteheads at the same position). > > Have a look at this link <https://musescore.org/en/node/14449> and that link > <https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/24030/what-does-this-split-stem-notation-mean> > to see some related examples of music written by Chopin, Ravel and Scriabin > ... > > Knut
Another extreme example: Ornstein, Wild mans dance http://imslp.org/wiki/Wild_Men's_Dance%2C_SO_54_(Ornstein%2C_Leo) Perhaps my old coding here (after an idea by Mike Solomon) https://archiv.lilypondforum.de/index.php/topic,1176.msg6932.html#msg6932 may be found helpful. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
