> I see! Thank you for the clarification. Fortunately, I'm *great* at
> scouring archives looking for one tiny specific thing.
:-)
> I assume two-flag glyphs are 16th notes and smaller?
Normally, Petrucci glyphs with a single flag are transcribed to modern
notation as 16th, so glyphs with two flags would be rather 32nds.
> I'll start with Petrucci's IMSLP page (assuming you haven't already
> searched every nook and cranny of it) and, if I don't find anything
> there, go for online archives of Italy's national libraries and
> such.
Thanks in advance. As Graham mentioned in another e-mail, it might be
hard to find, though.
> Taking from the Parmesan .mf files, I take it the ideal would be
> having between staff lines, on staff lines, [...]
Well, no. AFAICS, Petrucci flags are identical for
between-staff-lines and on-staff-line situations, which simplifies
things.
> [...] and anywhere examples for both up and down 8th notes and 16th
> notes, and we can at least deduce smaller notes from there if
> needed.
If Graham's is right, the two-flags glyph might have only an
incomplete second flag.
Werner
