Hi Thien-Thi. On 05/23/2012 12:22 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > () Stefano Lattarini <[email protected]> > () Wed, 23 May 2012 11:24:25 +0200 > > Is this thread still alive, or have we, again :-(, dropped the > ball on this? It seemed to me we were near to reach consensus > on the latest patches posted by Thien-Thi. And it is a shame > that the ChangeLog recommendations are so out-of-sync with the > current usages and best practices. > > It seems the main point of contention is whether or not TITLE > is mandatory. > We agreed it should be recommended, rather than strictly mandatory: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-standards/2012-05/msg00000.html> (which is a good step forward IMHO).
> If it's not mandatory, i see no point in making > the proposal -- status quo (everything optional) is fine. > I seem to recall you had made several other improvements as well, in addition to the summary line; am I mistaken? At this point, could you please post again the latest version of your proposed patch, for a fresh round of reviews? > The last i recall is that ams was going to post more comments. > (That's what i'm waiting for, at least. Have i misunderstood?) > I don't know, sorry; I've lost track who's waiting who here (for all I remember, you might have been waiting comments from me :-) Thanks for your perseverance, Stefano
