Okay, thanks for the explanation.
I (re)copied the fdl verbatim from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.texi
which effectively makes the change you were proposing.
J'
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
Hi John,
On 2020-08-18 11:49, John Darrington wrote:
> Your proposal seems good to me.
>
> However the fdl is not something which we can change at will, since its
> copyright is owned by the FSF and they do not permit derivative works.
I agree that changing a license text is a delicate thing.
But there are 2 different texts of the FDL out there, and that link is the
only difference between them, so I guess this is just an old bug.
So the question is:
which of the 2 texts of the FDL license is the correct one?
The one from 'licenses' or the one from 'standards'?
Who can clarify?
Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny
