Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately (for my configuration) it appears that the --rsh option > only accepts a path to an executable.
Yes, currently it is so. > option of the rsync command, which works successfully with my > configuration. I believe my configuration/requirements to be fairly > standard (by security wonks), and I want to request that the --rsh > semantics be changed Yes, that's reasonable. I'll add this to my `todo' list. > (or for advice on how I can do this with existing tar)... For the time being you can use a shell wrapper around ssh, as others on the list have proposed. Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ Bug-tar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-tar
