Thanks for the feedback. I realized I could create the wrapper script shortly after sending the email... But I'm glad my proposal was worthwhile.
Nathan
On 8/29/05, Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately (for my configuration) it appears that the --rsh option
> only accepts a path to an executable.
Yes, currently it is so.
> option of the rsync command, which works successfully with my
> configuration. I believe my configuration/requirements to be fairly
> standard (by security wonks), and I want to request that the --rsh
> semantics be changed
Yes, that's reasonable. I'll add this to my `todo' list.
> (or for advice on how I can do this with existing tar)...
For the time being you can use a shell wrapper around ssh, as others
on the list have proposed.
Regards,
Sergey
_______________________________________________ Bug-tar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-tar
