Leonard Sitongia wrote:
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:

Have you tried -i (--ignore-zeros) option?

No, I haven't. Right now, I'm trying a simpler test. Instead of using multiple tar commands in writing to the tapes, I've used one command, with a lot of data, to span the multi-tape archive. Now I'm going to read it on Linux to see if it handles the prompt for the 2nd tape better.

Well, my simpler test (one tar command that will span multiple tapes) failed worse than before (that is, tar 1.19 seems to do worse than 1.15). I can see from the write that the file being written (or last written?) at the tape changes was g/20050421/20050421.121910.fts, and when the read gets to this:

g/20050421/20050421.121910.fts
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
tar: Too many errors, quitting
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tape]# tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.19

--
==Leonard E. Sitongia
  High Altitude Observatory
  National Center for Atmospheric Research
  P.O. Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307  USA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  voice: (303)497-2454  fax: (303)497-1589



Reply via email to