> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:55:25 +0000
> Cc: [email protected]
> From: Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]>
>
> But in this particular case, this:
>
> Those codes which have a lisp function or variable as a direct equivalent:
> `*' (check not read-only): `barf-if-buffer-readonly'
> `d' (point): `point'
> `i' (nil): `nil'
> `m' (mark):`mark'
> `n' (number): `read-number'
> `P' (raw prefix): `current-prefix-arg' (variable)
> `r' (region): `region-beginning' and `region-end'
> `v' (user option): `read-variable'
> `x' (lisp expression): `read-minibuffer'
> `X' (evaluate lisp expression): `eval-minibuffer'
> `z' (coding system): `read-coding-system'
>
> is more readable, more beautiful, take less space than this:
>
> Those codes which have a lisp function or variable as a direct equivalent:
>
> `*' (check not read-only): `barf-if-buffer-readonly'
>
> `d' (point): `point'
Will the following be acceptable for you?
`*' (check not read-only)
`barf-if-buffer-readonly'
`d' (point)
`point'
`i' (nil)
`nil'
`m' (mark)
`mark'
`n' (number)
`read-number'
etc. If this is okay, you could try @table instead of @itemize.
