'Evening, Karl! On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:02:25PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote: > Is this wise?
> Well, there are a number of good reasons to do so, or I wouldn't have > gone to all the trouble of pushing it. Better HTML output (which many > people ask for), better expansion control, more maintainable source, > .... That perl must be good. :-) > ... anyway, as far as I'm concerned, it's happening. It all *could* > be done in C, but the reality has been that neither I nor anyone else > has time to bring makeinfo up to anything like the level of > functionality in texi2html. > half a minute to generate Elisp, that would set me (and others?) > back to a "batch mode" development process. > I hope it isn't 10x slower, but even if it is, 30 seconds does not seem > like an insurmountable lengthy span of time. Sorry. Well, I could always get faster hardware. But yes, I could cope with 30s. > Best, > karl Thanks, and goodnight! -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
