On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 07:04:11PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > I had to keep amsfonts even with unicode-math for \circledR. I also > > replaced the use of mdframed by tcolorbox, which is an improvement. > > Could the change from mdframed to tcolorbox be worth mentioning in NEWS > in case this affects dependencies etc.?
I do not think that it is needed as it is a well established package. > I see this is recommended online in the context of "LaTeX tagging": > > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/761162/why-does-documentmetadata-conflict-with-package-mdframed > https://latex3.github.io/tagging-project/tagging-status/ > > I noticed that the output of @cartouche in LaTeX now has a shaded background, > and the panel borders seem thicker. I assume these are the default settings > for tcolorbox, as it doesn't appear that texi2any specifies any background in > its output: > > % the tcolorbox environment for @cartouche > \newtcolorbox{Texinfocartouche}[1][]{arc=10pt,#1} > > I assume we should leave the output with the tcolorbox defaults, even though > this is a change in the appearance of the texi2any output. Such change in appearance seems to me to be in the bound of what we can change at will. > The user can always > add extra settings to change the appearance if they want to. As a side note, I personnally think that the new appearance is better. And the title looks also better, in my opinion, not that it really matters. > OK to remove the "arc=10pt" parameter? Ok for me. -- Pat
