W dniu 13.05.2015 o 13:28, Ander Juaristi pisze: > And second, I'm not really sure whether --condget is the best name for > the switch. > Requests that include any of If-Unmodified-Since, If-Match, > If-None-Match, or If-Range > header fields are also "conditional GETs" as well. > We might want to implement one of those in the future and we'd be forced > to choose a name which could easily be > inconsistent/confusing with --condget. Or maybe we won't. But we don't > know that now, so I think > it's better to choose a switch more specific to the fact that an > If-Modified-Since header will be sent > so as to avoid confusion. > Do you have an idea for a better switch name that would not be too long? I have noticed that issue earlier, but could not think of a better name that would not be too long. :D
Thank you for the suggestions, Hubert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
