Am Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2015, 15:43:54 schrieb Hubert Tarasiuk: > W dniu 13.05.2015 o 13:28, Ander Juaristi pisze: > > And second, I'm not really sure whether --condget is the best name for > > the switch. > > Requests that include any of If-Unmodified-Since, If-Match, > > If-None-Match, or If-Range > > header fields are also "conditional GETs" as well. > > We might want to implement one of those in the future and we'd be forced > > to choose a name which could easily be > > inconsistent/confusing with --condget. Or maybe we won't. But we don't > > know that now, so I think > > it's better to choose a switch more specific to the fact that an > > If-Modified-Since header will be sent > > so as to avoid confusion. > > Do you have an idea for a better switch name that would not be too long? > I have noticed that issue earlier, but could not think of a better name > that would not be too long. :D > > Thank you for the suggestions,
Hi Hubert, why not --if-modified-since as a boolean option ? I personally would set it to true by default, since it is a very common/basic HTTP 1.1 header. Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
