DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-13 17:51 ------- While I do believe the previous unlimited approach could be a DoS. Nice catch. I have to believe the "one size limit fits all" approach will not work for all the existing applications in the world. However, shouldn't we add a SSLMaxIOBuffer directive instead of hardcoding the value at build time? This way any pre-built server or existing applications have a way to raise/lower this value as needed for any given virtual host or directory? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
