--- Comment #39 from Eric Covener <> ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #37)
> (In reply to Reindl Harald from comment #36)
> > 
> > i simply don't understand why he steps in and argues back and forth with no
> > intention to get it fixed but talking only about all sorts of workarounds
> > which are not the intention of the bugreport
> All I see in Eric's arguments is a way to make your case work, even if it's
> not the way you'd like to. You care about your case, he cares about all the
> others case too, which shouldn't be broken by arbitrary change in "optional"
> semantics...
> > 
> > i can assure you that the whole community of http-users is waiting many
> > years and a lot of people will appreciate the oppotunity write a vhost
> > config like this
> > 
> > <VirtualHost *:80 *:443>
> >  DocumentRoot "/www/contentlounge"
> >  ServerName
> >  SSLEngine optional
> >  SSLCertificateFile "conf/ssl/"
> > </VirtualHost>

A lot of people would appreciate that, but surely not the whole community is
waiting for it.  With the patch, This still also requires a second, :443-only
VH as the default/first-listed for *:443 as we revealed in a later comment (due
to my intefering no less).

Two vhosts for SSL and non-SSL is not revolutionary. I think a single vhost
would be a good feature, and is similar to the non-LE mod_md stuff being
discussed on dev@ (which you are required to post under an alias on because of
your conflicts with people not named Eric Covener).  But even this is not a
slam dunk if it introduces addl complexity and multiple ways to do the same
thing when there are already suitable options.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

Reply via email to