2009/4/9 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_and...@member.fsf.org>: > 2009/4/9 Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@sun.com>: >> Andrew Haley wrote: >>> >>> : >>> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches >>> These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot. >>> >>> >>> * Every patch should be assigned to someone. >>> >>> * Every patch should be discussed. >>> >>> * If we can, we will push a patch upstream. If we can't the discussion >>> should explain why we can't. >>> >>> Here we go... >>> >>> Andrew. >>> >> >> I'm not very familiar with IcedTea but I cloned the repository to see what >> these patches are about. Here are a few comments: >> >> icedtea-6728542-epoll.patch seems to be a change-set I pushed to jdk7 last >> year. It seems very reasonable to push this into jdk6/jdk6/jdk. Go for it! >> > > Yes, I've referenced the bug on the wiki now. Joe, can we commit this to 6? > >> icedtea-bytebuffer-compact.patch - this looks to be a partial fix to >> 6593946. If so, 6593946 is already in jdk6/jdk6/jdk >> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/3e7bfcdcf96f). >> > > IcedTea6 is still based on the last build drop of jdk6, not the > Mercurial repository. So this 6 week old patch won't be in the 25th > of November b14 tarball. > Interestingly, it also still exists in IcedTea7 as there were cases > covered by the patch which didn't make it into the commit. > I've attached that version. It was originally added by Keith Seitz > while he was working on OpenJDK at Red Hat (according to the > ChangeLog). > >> icedtea-io_util-overflow.patch - this looks like the initial fix for >> 6788196. Martin has already pushed this to jdk6/jdk7/jdk >> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/cc4d93e8ae7d). >> > > Same case as the epoll patch, not in b14. > >> icedtea-jvmtiEnv.patch - I thought JvmtiEnv::GetLineNumberTable already >> handled this case so I'm curious why this one is needed. >> > > Added by Andrew Haley as part of work on Shark; perhaps he can explain. > >> icedtea-network-unreachable.patch - I'm pretty sure net-dev would be open to >> this because it looks to be cases where the specific exceptions aren't >> thrown in the timed read case. >> > > From our intern, Omair so this is covered by the SCA. Omair, maybe > you could file a bug report for this (or link to one here if there is > one)? > >> icedtea-sunsrc.patch - I'm not sure what this is about but it looks like it >> removes the service configuration files. Does JDI still work? >> > > Don't know about this one, all I can say is it was added by Joshua > Sumali in late 2007. Perhaps someone at Red Hat then can shed some > light on it? > >> icedtea-testenv.patch - the changes to >> test/sun/net/InetAddress/nameservice/dns/cname.sh seems reasonable (pilot >> error is why this one was missed when the other tests were updated). >> > > Recent patch from Mark Wielaard. Mark? > >> icedtea-jtreg-hatrun.patch - I suspect this is 6545295. We should just fix >> this test (serviceability-dev). >> > > Again, this one is from Omair, so he should be able to provide more detail. > >> -Alan. >> >> PS: I'm not on distro-pkg-dev so this mail might need the moderator to >> approve. >> >> > > Thanks again for the conf. call, very useful! > > Cheers, > -- > Andrew :-) > > Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > Support Free Java! > Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK > http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath > http://openjdk.java.net > > PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) > Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >
And then forgot the patch! -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
icedtea-bytebuffer-compact.patch
Description: Binary data
