On 8/03/2013 7:19 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 08/03/2013 01:48, David Holmes wrote:
Not sure which is best list for this given Alan will likely be the
only reviewer anyway :)

Webrevs under:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8009428_8009429/
As further background to others, the reverting of the $ substitution
became possible when Nashorn removed $ from its generated classes [1].

I've looked through the changes and they look really good to me. Putting
$< in single quotes to avoid shell expansion is the solution that I
could not find when adding the de-beaning recipes a few months ago. It's
great to see PROFILE_4 renamed to FULL_JRE and is also great to remove
the redundant sub-packages from the include lists. For
profiles-rtjar-includes then I think it makes it much more readable and
maintainable. Two minor inconsistencies: the sub-packages of
javax.naming are listed and com/sun/jndi/ has a trailing slash.

Fixed - well spotted!

One probable side effect of removing the redundant sub-packages will be
the javadoc. The one case to date where we didn't list sub-packages is
java.time (because there are still changes going on there) and that the
result is that the sub-packages of java.time don't show up in the
profiles view. I created 8008367 a few weeks for that and I suspect that
once these changes are pushed that the profiles view will be very
incomplete. I don't think this should be a reason to hold off your
changes as the profiles view isn't right now anyway. Hopefully Bhavesh
will get to this soon.

Now I'm a little concerned. I had not considered whether javac/javadoc considered these to be complete lists. They have to know how to combine the includes at a low-level with the excludes of a higher-level - and potentially vice-versa.

I think Erik should review this too as it's important that the build
changes in jdk8/tl will merge easily with changes going into jdk8/build.

OK.

Thanks,
David

-Alan.

[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/nashorn/rev/fe5211fc3114

Reply via email to