> On Feb 28, 2018, at 2:43 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 28/02/2018 18:25, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This RFR request moves the javax.transaction.xa package out of the java.sql >> module and into its own module java.transaction.xa. One of the motivators >> for this change is due to the fact JSR 907 1.3 MR indicated that the >> javax.transaction.xa package will be subsumed by Java SE. >> >> There should be no compatibility issues with this change. Any module that >> `requires java.sql` will continue to have access to the public classes in >> the javax.transaction.xa package at both compile-time and run-time. >> >> > I skipped the tests but everything else looks good. It is a compatible change > as you noted. Thank you Alan > > Is there any XA text from the original JTA spec that should be added to the > module description as part of this? Another way to ask this is whether the > JTA 1.3 drops any text dealing with the XA part. Still waiting to see what changes are made to the PDF spec, that is still needing to be completed. So I think for now, we go with what we have and can circle back if needed.
Best Lance > > -Alan <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
