On 2019-02-01 05:23, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Matthias,

On 1/02/2019 12:50 am, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Please review  this small webrev  . It contains a few changes  for  building hotspot   on AIX with xlclang++  / xlc16  . ( most likely switching to   xlclang++  / xlc16    will be a must once  we introduce C++11/14 features )

Some comments on the changes :


- porting_aix.cpp  :  workaround for demangle.h (does not work with xlclang++)

Can't comment as I know nothing about it.

- arguments.cpp/hpp  :  the UNSUPPORTED_OPTON macro lead  to assigning false to AllocateHeapAt which is a bad idea (and does not work with xlclang++)

Good catch!

-   globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp   : xlclang++ sets   __GNUC__ so we must not  have #error ... in this case

Confused. Which other xlc compilers set __GNUC_ as you are changing this for all of them?

Unfortunately, I think __GNUC__ is set by many compilers who wish to express that (they believe) they are compatible with gcc (in one way or another). I'm pretty sure it's set by solstudio, for instance. And clang. But I might be wrong, and I might be thinking about some other gcc feature macro.

/Magnus
Though to be honest I don't understand this whole section anyway - we have a lengthy comment saying why you can't necessarily assign NULL to an integer type and to use NULL_WORD instead but then it's defined as NULL anyway! I wonder if we used to have some other conditions there where it was something different? In any case having an if and else that do exactly the same thing seems rather pointless to me.

Thanks,
David



Bug/webrev :

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218136

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8218136.0/


Thanks, Matthias


Reply via email to