On 2019-02-06 09:05, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Thank's Götz !
David + Magnus may I add you as reviewers ?
Sure.
/Magnus
Best regards, Matthias
-----Original Message-----
From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sent: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2019 18:05
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; David Holmes
<david.hol...@oracle.com>; 'hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-
d...@openjdk.java.net>; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
<magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>
Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++ from
xlc16 on AIX
looks good, thanks for the adjustment!
Best regards,
Goetz.
-----Original Message-----
From: Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2019 17:56
To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; David Holmes
<david.hol...@oracle.com>; 'hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-
d...@openjdk.java.net>; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
<magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>
Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++ from
xlc16 on AIX
Hi Götz, new webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8218136.4/
The old xlc stuff is good to be removed.
Could you please remove USE_XLC_PREFETCH_WRITE_BUILTIN
altogether and replace its only use by USE_XLC_BUILTINS?
Done .
Also, I think it makes sense to put
#if __IBMCPP__ < 1000
#error "xlc < 10 not supported"
#endif
into the file.
Probably we should even check for having at least xlc 12.
I added a check for xlc 12.
Also slightly changed the check for AIX (_AIX macro) in
globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp .
The demangle fix is kind of preliminary, but to get the compiler
working it is acceptable to skip this code for now.
There might be a fix for xlc16 in the future but so far we have to live with
it.
Best regards, Matthias
-----Original Message-----
From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sent: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2019 09:59
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; David Holmes
<david.hol...@oracle.com>; 'hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net'
<hotspot-
d...@openjdk.java.net>; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
<magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>
Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++ from
xlc16 on AIX
Hi Matthias,
The demangle fix is kind of preliminary, but to get the compiler
working it is acceptable to skip this code for now.
The old xlc stuff is good to be removed.
Could you please remove USE_XLC_PREFETCH_WRITE_BUILTIN
altogether and replace its only use by USE_XLC_BUILTINS?
Also, I think it makes sense to put
#if __IBMCPP__ < 1000
#error "xlc < 10 not supported"
#endif
into the file.
Probably we should even check for having at least xlc 12.
Best regards,
Goetz.
-----Original Message-----
From: hotspot-dev <hotspot-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On
Behalf
Of
Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Montag, 4. Februar 2019 12:36
To: David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>; 'hotspot-
d...@openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net>;
'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com' <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>
Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++
from
xlc16 on AIX
Hi David, I want to follow your suggestion 😊 .
I adjusted the comment , see globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp .
Additionally I removed a strange ifdef handling pre-xlc10 versions that
are
not useful today any more for OpenJDK
( we most likely cannot build jdk/jdk with xlc versions < 10).
New webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8218136.2/
Best regards, Matthias
-----Original Message-----
From: David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>
Sent: Freitag, 1. Februar 2019 13:49
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; 'hotspot-
d...@openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net>;
'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com' <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>
Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++
from
xlc16 on AIX
Hi Matthias,
On 1/02/2019 10:36 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
New webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8218136.1/
- adjusted globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp
I don't think it makes sense to keep the comment which was
obviously
copied from the gcc file:
// On Linux NULL is defined as a special type '__null'. Assigning
__null to
// integer variable will cause gcc warning. Use NULL_WORD in places
where a
// pointer is stored as integer value. On some platforms,
sizeof(intptr_t) >
// sizeof(void*), so here we want something which is integer type,
but has the
// same size as a pointer.
Rather something like:
// Some platform/tool-chain combinations can't assign NULL to an
integer
// type so we define NULL_WORD to use in those contexts. For xlc
they
// are the same.
Thanks,
David
