> Some of the --without options are not properly handled and will crash when > processed (For example, --without-version-string), in other cases the > --without-* option will actually silently produce incorrect results instead > of actually doing what --without-* implies (For example, --without-build-user > and all the --with-vendor-* options). The most elegant way to solve this > would simply be to handle such cases and display warnings when they're > encountered (or if the option is critical to the build process, throwing an > error) > > Even if it doesn't make sense to pass said option however, it should display > a warning instead of letting configure exit with a confusing error when it's > run > > This is an initial change and I may have missed several options; I'll double > check and make sure in the meantime
Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Handle remaining options and change critical options to error when --without is passed ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7713/files - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7713/files/54bbfae5..c9699eb7 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=7713&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=7713&range=00-01 Stats: 24 lines in 1 file changed: 12 ins; 10 del; 2 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7713.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7713/head:pull/7713 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7713