On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:25:09 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Should we use the workaround I have proposed above until a better solution >> for [JDK-8336664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336664) is available? >> Or are there other suggestions? > > At the moment doing the conversion in Java and using a bigger carrier type > (like `long`) is the only possible workaround. I don't have the expertise to confirm the correctness of that code change. @mcimadamore, are you comfortable to include the patch for PPC64 as described in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28931#discussion_r2662361633? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28931#discussion_r2695433254
