On Friday, March 18, 2016 10:47:58 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dne 17.3.2016 v 15:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > On Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:24:30 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 17.3.2016 v 14:10 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > >>> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:55:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >>>> I just discovered - by coincidence - that Koji is already using DNF > >> > >> for F24 > >> > >>>> builds. > >>>> > >>>> So unless somebody object I will change mock default config for F24 > >> > >> to use > >> > >>>> DNF too. > >>> > >>> It was announced correctly[1] The change was made in rawhide 5 months > >> > >> ago, > >> > >>> there is no way we would change f24 back to yum after having build > >> > >> rawhide > >> > >>> using dnf > >> > >> Please make sure that Koji as well as Mock are (not)installing weak > >> dependencies. > > > > Koji is installing them. > > Yes, I know and I also know the mock does not install them by default. > That was the point I wanted to made. > > > I have asked FPC to decide how they should be > > handled. > > Any ticket number by a chance? > > > do note that yourchanges around rubypick have caused issues because > > for soem reason dnf is aacting different on different arches about > > it. so if > > > we enforce weak dependencies not being installed you will have a lot > > of work > > > to fix up all the ruby packages > > I am fine with that work, since it is step in right direction ... and it > was workarounded by Peter anyway. > > TBH, since it seems secondary arches are currently doing just fine > without weak dependencies installed (due to some weird DNF bug), I'd say > that it should be fine to not install them on primary arches. > We have taken steps to ensure weak dependencies get installed on secondary arches
Dennis -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
