On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:07:33 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, March 18, 2016 10:47:58 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Dne 17.3.2016 v 15:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > > On Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:24:30 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >> Dne 17.3.2016 v 14:10 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > >>> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:55:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >>>> I just discovered - by coincidence - that Koji is already
> > >>>> using DNF
> > >>
> > >> for F24
> > >>
> > >>>> builds.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So unless somebody object I will change mock default config
> > >>>> for F24
> > >>
> > >> to use
> > >>
> > >>>> DNF too.
> > >>>
> > >>> It was announced correctly[1] The change was made in rawhide 5
> > >>> months
> > >>
> > >> ago,
> > >>
> > >>> there is no way we would change f24 back to yum after having
> > >>> build
> > >>
> > >> rawhide
> > >>
> > >>> using dnf
> > >>
> > >> Please make sure that Koji as well as Mock are (not)installing
> > >> weak dependencies.
> > >
> > > Koji is installing them.
> >
> > Yes, I know and I also know the mock does not install them by
> > default. That was the point I wanted to made.
> >
> > > I have asked FPC to decide how they should be
> > > handled.
> >
> > Any ticket number by a chance?
> >
> > > do note that yourchanges around rubypick have caused issues
> > > because for soem reason dnf is aacting different on different
> > > arches about
> >
> > it. so if
> >
> > > we enforce weak dependencies not being installed you will have a
> > > lot
> >
> > of work
> >
> > > to fix up all the ruby packages
> >
> > I am fine with that work, since it is step in right direction ...
> > and it was workarounded by Peter anyway.
> >
> > TBH, since it seems secondary arches are currently doing just fine
> > without weak dependencies installed (due to some weird DNF bug),
> > I'd say that it should be fine to not install them on primary
> > arches.
> >
> We have taken steps to ensure weak dependencies get installed on
> secondary arches
the workaround for explicitly BR: ruby was applied by Peter to a subset
of packages only and unfortunately the problem with weak deps still
exists on s390(x). But it went away on aarch64.
Dan
--
buildsys mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
