>> > Dne 17.3.2016 v 15:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): >> > > On Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:24:30 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: >> > >> Dne 17.3.2016 v 14:10 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): >> > >>> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:55:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> > >>>> I just discovered - by coincidence - that Koji is already >> > >>>> using DNF >> > >> >> > >> for F24 >> > >> >> > >>>> builds. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> So unless somebody object I will change mock default config >> > >>>> for F24 >> > >> >> > >> to use >> > >> >> > >>>> DNF too. >> > >>> >> > >>> It was announced correctly[1] The change was made in rawhide 5 >> > >>> months >> > >> >> > >> ago, >> > >> >> > >>> there is no way we would change f24 back to yum after having >> > >>> build >> > >> >> > >> rawhide >> > >> >> > >>> using dnf >> > >> >> > >> Please make sure that Koji as well as Mock are (not)installing >> > >> weak dependencies. >> > > >> > > Koji is installing them. >> > >> > Yes, I know and I also know the mock does not install them by >> > default. That was the point I wanted to made. >> > >> > > I have asked FPC to decide how they should be >> > > handled. >> > >> > Any ticket number by a chance? >> > >> > > do note that yourchanges around rubypick have caused issues >> > > because for soem reason dnf is aacting different on different >> > > arches about >> > >> > it. so if >> > >> > > we enforce weak dependencies not being installed you will have a >> > > lot >> > >> > of work >> > >> > > to fix up all the ruby packages >> > >> > I am fine with that work, since it is step in right direction ... >> > and it was workarounded by Peter anyway. >> > >> > TBH, since it seems secondary arches are currently doing just fine >> > without weak dependencies installed (due to some weird DNF bug), >> > I'd say that it should be fine to not install them on primary >> > arches. >> > >> We have taken steps to ensure weak dependencies get installed on >> secondary arches > > the workaround for explicitly BR: ruby was applied by Peter to a subset > of packages only and unfortunately the problem with weak deps still > exists on s390(x). But it went away on aarch64.
In my experience -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
