possible errata:
Ruth, the "Devices (requiring prescription)" shows NCPDP as the recommended
IG, which is probably incorrect. Then there are two other "DME" entries
with no IG checked off. I believe all three of these items could be rolled
into a single "DME" entry for which the 837-P would be the correct IG. I'm
not sure that the "requiring prescription" attribute would be relevant to
the choice of IG for a medical equipment or device claim. I'm also not
sure how a claim would be processed for a drug or biological that that does
NOT have an NDC code. I'm thinking of things like over-the-counter
plant-based estrogen compounds, some artificial tears (also OTC), etc. I
assume that if they did not have an NDC code assigned the 837-p would be
used... unless a pharmacy was billing??
-Chris
At 09:54 AM 7/31/01 -0500, Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A. wrote:
>I have been gathering services from the UNISYS states and from the emails
>that Zon has been sending ... I have collected the services that are billed
>on proprietary forms, HCFA1500, and UB forms. These are discussion items
>for the members of the WG to write this paper. It's just a "gathering" into
>a spreadsheet for discussion for today's Business Issues meeting.
>
> <<Services to IG.xls>>
>
>Ruth Tucci-Kaufhold
>UNISYS Corporation
>4050 Innslake Drive
>Suite 202
>Glen Allen, VA 23060
>(804) 346-1138
>(804) 935-1647 (fax)
>N246-1138
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
Christopher J. Feahr, OD Vision Data Standards Council
Executive Director http://visiondatastandard.org
Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
