i asked: > someone was asking me whether the implementation of dpkg in > busybox was useful and/or complete enough to use in any sort > of a product environment. since i've never used it, i told > them i'd ask the list. i checked svn, and see that dpkg_deb.c
i guess the complete lack of response implies that while it might work, not very many people use it. :-) fair enough... paul > hasn't had any commits (other than those resulting from global > cleanups) in quite a long time. dpkg.c, however, has been > getting recent bugfixes. > > can anyone with recent experience comment on how well it > works? if the space were available, would using the "real" > dpkg be a better idea? > > paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
