hi kim -- thanks! that will help us with our decision a lot... paul
> Hi Paul, > > I somehow missed your original post. > > > > someone was asking me whether the implementation of dpkg in > > > busybox was useful and/or complete enough to use in any sort > > > of a product environment. > > We are using BusyBox's dpkg in our Access Server product. It's complete > and stable enough for production environment. > > > dpkg.c, however, has been getting recent bugfixes. > > I think most of them are submitted by me. :-) > > > > works? if the space were available, would using the "real" > > > dpkg be a better idea? > > Yes. For example, you can't create deb-file with BusyBox (ok, you can, > manually with tar + ar), you can only install them. BusyBox is also > missing support for md5 check. =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
