obviously it is not a general fault, please describe you environment busybox 1.9.0 (from busybox.net i guess ?) gcc version ? (others, perhaps details like crosscompile, private linker etc) Processor ? libc version ?
re, wh Christian MICHON wrote: > On 1/22/08, walter harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i did a quick check on my desktop (glibc). >> and it works as expected >> >> does only fdisk -l segfault or also fdisk -l /dev/xxx ? >> >> re, >> wh > > all cases fail. This is new to me, since I used busybox with uclibc > (almost from day 1, though I was not registered yet to this mailing list) > > anyone can perform a test on uclibc please ? > > Thanks for testing Walter :) > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
