Christian MICHON wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 10:48 AM, walter harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> obviously it is not a general fault, please describe you environment >> >> busybox 1.9.0 (from busybox.net i guess ?) >> gcc version ? (others, perhaps details like crosscompile, private linker etc) >> Processor ? >> libc version ? > > sure. :) > > busybox-1.9.0 from busybox.net > uclibc-0.9.29 from uclibc.org > gcc-3.4.6 (no crosscompilation: direct x86/32 native compilation) > binutils-2.16.1 > processor: i686 (also tried on AMD, virtual machines) >
I have checked you config (with glibc, dynamic linked) Guess we can leave that to uclibc gurus. re, wh example: bbfdisk vs fdisk ./busybox fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 1025 MB, 1025507328 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 124 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 1 92 738958+ 83 Linux /dev/sdb2 93 124 257040 c Win95 FAT32 (LBA) /sbin/fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 1025 MB, 1025507328 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 124 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 1 92 738958+ 83 Linux /dev/sdb2 93 124 257040 c W95 FAT32 (LBA) _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
