no i remember, the was a discussion lately (see: "do ... while(0) optimization problem") about gcc optimizes G_INIT away. can you test with a newer gcc version (4.2 or so), or play with optimisation to see if the problems goes away ?
re, wh Christian MICHON wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 10:48 AM, walter harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> obviously it is not a general fault, please describe you environment >> >> busybox 1.9.0 (from busybox.net i guess ?) >> gcc version ? (others, perhaps details like crosscompile, private linker etc) >> Processor ? >> libc version ? > > sure. :) > > busybox-1.9.0 from busybox.net > uclibc-0.9.29 from uclibc.org > gcc-3.4.6 (no crosscompilation: direct x86/32 native compilation) > binutils-2.16.1 > processor: i686 (also tried on AMD, virtual machines) > > the full environment to reproduce/see this error is inside the detaolb_v08.iso > (use it in a vm if you want to see it) > > http://prdownloads.sf.net/detaolb/detaolb_v08.iso > > the problem lies in the INIT_G new structure, as reported by gdb/ddd > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
