On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:22:54AM -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM, David N. Lombard wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:43:39PM -0800, Kevin Dankwardt wrote: > >> On 03/02/2010 11:42 AM, Yan Seiner wrote: > >> > > >> > The '|&' operator throws an error. > >> ... > >> What does |& have to do with a network port, anyway? Its a Bourne > >> Shellism for piping standard error, I believe. > > > > It's a csh-ism to pipe a comingled stdout and stderr. > > > > Bourne et al. use "2>" to redirect stderr specifically. > > bash-4.1 supports "|&" now as well as some similar variants
Is '|&' any different than "2>&1"? -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
