On Friday 05 March 2010 15:51:35 David N. Lombard wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:07:25PM -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 05 March 2010 10:13:00 David N. Lombard wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:22:54AM -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > bash-4.1 supports "|&" now as well as some similar variants > > > > > > Is '|&' any different than "2>&1"? > > > > the former is a pipe while the latter is a redirect. ignoring that, > > let's go with "yes". > > Clearly I failed to express the complete thought.
your latter example above lacks a pipe. the example below has a pipe. > How does > > producer |& consumer > > differ from > > producer 2>&1 | consumer > > beside a more compact representation? as i said, "yes" -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
