On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:07:25PM -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 10:13:00 David N. Lombard wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:22:54AM -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >
> > > bash-4.1 supports "|&" now as well as some similar variants
> >
> > Is '|&' any different than "2>&1"?
>
> the former is a pipe while the latter is a redirect. ignoring that, let's go
> with "yes".
Clearly I failed to express the complete thought.
How does
producer |& consumer
differ from
producer 2>&1 | consumer
beside a more compact representation?
--
David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA
I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
